Re: A83: ASM83-or-ASM89???

To: Olle Hedman <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A83: ASM83-or-ASM89???
From: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 23:48:20 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-83-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <362A5EB2.D893D704@hem.passagen.se>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


_32bit_ 68000 please... =)

Linus

On 18-Oct-98, Olle Hedman wrote:

>I have both the 83 and the 89..

>My oppinion is that the 83 is a much simpler beginners assembler because the
>z80 in it is a simpler 8 bit processor and much more easy to learn than the
>16bit 68000 in the ti89..

>but.. because of the simple z80.. som things are harder to do on it..  or
>needs
>a bit more thinking..
>and the 68000 _is_ much more powerfull, and you can make much cooler games on
>it
>;)

>this is just my oppinion..  i like them both but in different ways :)

>//Olle

>ManjiLump@aol.com wrote:
>> 
>> I was just wondering what anyone thinks or knows about assembly for the 89.
>I
>> heard it was a lot easier than 83 asm. I might buy one for that reason, and
>it
>> has grayscale!
>> But the 83 was what I started out on...should I leave the 83 and get the
>newer
>> better calc or stay with 83? Suggestions anyone?
>> 
>> -Michael
>> 
>> P.S.-What and how did you win something James?

Follow-Ups:

Re: A83: ASM83-or-ASM89???

From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>

References:

Re: A83: ASM83-or-ASM89???

From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>