A83: Re: Re: Re: Joe Wingerbermuhle?

To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: A83: Re: Re: Re: Joe Wingerbermuhle?
From: "David Phillips" <electrum@tfs.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 23:28:34 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-83-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


But they _are_ the same size, 13 bytes each.  :)

The only difference is that mine destroys DE, but that's not bad for saving
21 t-states per loop iteration...

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Wingbermuehle <joewing@usmo.com>
To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Friday, November 06, 1998 3:40 PM
Subject: A83: Re: Re: Joe Wingerbermuhle?


>
>True, but I was writing the code to be small (so what else is new hehe).

>
>>                                      Bytes:  T-States:
>>=======================================================
>>Original routine:                    |  13   | 62 (23)
>>Preloaded byte counter:              |  14   | 59 (30)
>>Preloaded byte counter w/o reload:   |  13   | 55 (30)
>>Saved counters w/ registers:         |  14   | 46 (30)
>>Final routine:                       |  13   | 41 (30)