Re: A83: Re: Interrupts again

To: Trey Jazz <joemama@minot.com>
Subject: Re: A83: Re: Interrupts again
From: Dimitri Hammond <dimitri@dynet.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1998 13:35:07 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Delivered-To: assembly-83-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <007701bd5ffa$3723d5c0$104103cf@joemama.minot>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

Well, I understand that, but I was told that having an interrupt inc a 
var every 200/th of a second (when it is run) should work.  Why do you 
say otherwise?
Also,  I know interrupts don't run while the calc is off, that's why I 
would just implement low-power mode.  Yes, yes, I know that that will 
drain batteries, but that's beside the point!

		-Dimitri

On Sat, 4 Apr 1998, Trey Jazz wrote:

> 
> clock interupt...hmmm wont work period. it wont keep accurate time and
> interupt programs dont run when shut off...its basically useless
> 
> >Did anybody at all know anything about that interrupt inquiry a few days
> >ago (A83: Clock Interrupt Prog)?  Please, I need some help on that...
>

References:

A83: Re: Interrupts again

From: "Trey Jazz" <joemama@minot.com>

Prev: A83: Re: nat-my new asm prog
Next: Re: A83: "Batteries never die, they just fade away"
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread