[TI-M] Re: 1-Var stats on TI-82
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
[TI-M] Re: 1-Var stats on TI-82
Please delete this list from your spam
-----Original Message-----
From: gary jablonski [mailto:jab@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 6:41 PM
To: ti-math@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [TI-M] Re: 1-Var stats on TI-82
delete me from your list
-----Original Message-----
From: ti-math-bounce@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:ti-math-bounce@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of gary jablonski
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 12:24 PM
To: ti-math@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [TI-M] Re: 1-Var stats on TI-82
take me off your list
-----Original Message-----
From: ti-math-bounce@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:ti-math-bounce@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of David Balch
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 12:24 PM
To: ti-math@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [TI-M] Re: 1-Var stats on TI-82
raykornele wrote:
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Sign up for FREE iVillage newsletters <http://s.ivillage.com/rd/16705>.
> From health and pregnancy to shopping and relationships, iVillage
> has the scoop on what matters most to you.
>
> <-----Original Message----->
> >
> >From: David Balch
> >Sent: 2/16/2003 5:38:22 AM
> >To: ti-math@lists.ticalc.org
> >Subject: [TI-M] 1-Var stats on TI-82
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm new to the TI-world and am hoping that someone can help me.
> >
> >Am I right in thinking that the TI-82 cannot do 1-Var Stats on weighted
> >lists (with fractional numbers) - only on frequencies (with integers).
> >
> >Is there any way I can get it to work with weighted lists?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Dave.
> ===
> To do weighted lists (1-var) put the values in L1, and weights in L2.
> Then do 1-Var Stats L1,L2.
>
> For fractional weights just multiply them up to intgegers. No, TI-82 can't
> handle fractional weights.
>
> Use the same technique for 2-var. Put the lists in L1 and L2 and the
weights
> in L3. Do 2-Var Stats L1,L2,L3.
>
> KrazyKyngeKorny
Excellent, that works. It's a shame that the TI-82 doesn't seem to
handle weights greater than 99.
Thanks,
Dave.
Follow-Ups: