[TI-M] Re: complexes, ti-89 & 92+, polar and cSolve

[TI-M] Re: complexes, ti-89 & 92+, polar and cSolve

• To: ti-math@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: [TI-M] Re: complexes, ti-89 & 92+, polar and cSolve
• From: Carlos Becker <cjb@softhome.net>
• Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 22:09:36 -0300
• In-Reply-To: <000701c1c55c$473567f0$1700a8c0@paulspc>
• References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020306150127.00bcddd8@alpha.arcride.edu.ar>
• Reply-To: ti-math@lists.ticalc.org

>Maybe an intermediate step like storing Pi * i * 2 / 9
>in a variable [ALPHA]W and then computing e^W would
>help.

It didn't work :(

but my real problem is cSolve(z_^3 - 1/ (sqrt(3)-i)^4 = 0, z_)

which gives out the three results in a strange way.

>-- Paul

• [TI-M] complexes, ti-89 & 92+, polar and cSolve
• From: Carlos Becker <cjb@softhome.net>
• [TI-M] Re: complexes, ti-89 & 92+, polar and cSolve
• From: "Paul Fitzmeyer" <paulfitz@zoemedical.com>

• Prev: [TI-M] Re: complexes, ti-89 & 92+, polar and cSolve
• Next: [TI-M] Re: complexes, ti-89 & 92+, polar and cSolve
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread