Re: TI-M: TIM:Stupid question(?)

Re: TI-M: TIM:Stupid question(?)

• To: <ti-math@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: TI-M: TIM:Stupid question(?)
• From: "Daniel Bishop" <danb2k@hotmail.com>
• Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:33:59 -0500
• References: <4.3.2.7.2.20001026194412.01a64f08@mail.nickd.org>
• Reply-To: ti-math@lists.ticalc.org

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Disabato" <nickd@nickd.org>
To: <ti-math@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 19:45
Subject: Re: TI-M: TIM:Stupid question(?)

> At 08:36 PM 10/26/2000 -0400, you wrote:

> Unfortunately, derivatives aren't covered in precalculus, and that's bad.

Then you took the wrong precal class.  The one I took did cover derivatives
(but only the simplest ones: the chain rule, logarithmic differentiation,
etc., didn't come until the next year).

• Re: TI-M: TIM:Stupid question(?)
• From: Nick Disabato <nickd@nickd.org>

• Prev: Re: TI-M: TIM:Stupid question(?)
• Next: Re: TI-M: TIM:Stupid question(?)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread