Re: TI-M: Integral of x^x

To: ti-math@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-M: Integral of x^x
From: Andy Selle <aselle@ticalc.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 07:01:27 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To: <e2.5093cb3.26647b8f@aol.com>
Reply-To: ti-math@lists.ticalc.org


You aren't causing offense or anything... and I didn't mean to come off so
harsh.  I'm just putting in my two cents which could be wrong :).

-Andy


--
Andy Selle <aselle@ticalc.org>
   Programming and System Administration, Survey Editor, Accounts Manager
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/


On Mon, 29 May 2000 Force15@aol.com wrote:

> 
> I'm not pretending to know everything, I'm just telling everyone what I saw. 
> I know you didn't mean any offense though, so none taken :) Like I said, I 
> didn't really look at it quickly because I didn't have the time. Maybe the 
> sum I saw was for the definite integral from zero to one - I'm not sure. I 
> might be able to get back to the book tomorrow and if I do, I'll give a more 
> careful look and report what I find out. 
> 
> God Bless,
> Will Landry
> 
>

References:

Re: TI-M: Integral of x^x

From: Force15@aol.com