Re: TI-M: Algebra

To: ti-math@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-M: Algebra
From: Andy Selle <aselle@ticalc.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 19:48:04 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To: <l03130307b55fc3b38152@[216.164.128.140]>
Reply-To: ti-math@lists.ticalc.org

Generally LISP is interpreted on the fly.  There are reasons to use LISP
over assembly obviously, though.  For one it is much more geared to
dealing with list oriented data and it has the great feature that you can
easily create self modifying code.

--
Andy Selle <aselle@ticalc.org>
   Programming and System Administration, Survey Editor, Accounts Manager
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, DeRobertis wrote:

> 
> At 10:57 PM -0400 on 6/3/00, KingPrad@aol.com wrote:
> >And that would
> >require LISP because of its symbolic nature.
> 
> You could do it in any Turing-complete language you choose. Definitely in
> assembly, because ultimately the Lisp compiler compiles to assembly.
> 
> 
> 
>

References:

Re: TI-M: Algebra

From: "DeRobertis" <derobert@erols.com>

Prev: Re: TI-M: Algebra
Next: TI-M: Algebra- Extra stuff about my idea
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread