Re: TI-H: Dead?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Dead?
Is it just me, or was the date on this e-mail 12/31/69 at 6:11 PM?
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: <Larry79054@aol.com>
To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: TI-H: Dead?
>
> TWIMC,
> I prefer the taste/feel of Coke. But, here in Merced, CA, to where I've
> retired, it's damned near impossible to find a business that serves Coke as
> its soft drink---just Pepsi and its products (a very few do, and it is still
> possible to buy it in bottles and cans at retailers). I'm told that Pepsi
> made a BIG effort awhile back to undercut the price of Coke and has
> essentially taken over, as a result. So, as far as Merced is concerned, it's
> Coke's own fault, as they refuse to budge on their pricing policy. They just
> might, eventually, not be available here at all, if they keep that up.
> Larry Teebken (larry79054@aol.com)
>
> In a message dated 1/26/00 11:39:38 AM Pacific Standard Time, BFHSNO@aol.com
> writes:
>
> << I agree, I think the reason they were worried about Microsoft is that
> everyone was dependant on it, and they did things to keep themsleves on top,
> and others down. I don't think that America's general preference for Coke
> constitutes a forced monopoly on Coke's part. I won't argue with the expense
> though. :)
> >>
>
>
References: