Re: TI-H: Dead?

Re: TI-H: Dead?

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: Dead?
• From: BFHSNO@aol.com
• Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:39:02 EST
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

I agree, I think the reason they were worried about Microsoft is that 
everyone was dependant on it, and they did things to keep themsleves on top, 
and others down. I don't think that America's general preference for Coke 
constitutes a forced monopoly on Coke's part. I won't argue with the expense 
though. :)

In a message dated 1/26/00 7:38:51 AM Central Standard Time, 
rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu writes:

<< Anyway, if production stopped, then people would switch to a different 
brand,
 like Pepsi or something.  It's not _that_ hard.  Easier than lets say, 
everyone
 switching operating sytems from Windows to Linux where everything is so
 inter-dependent.
 
 Bryan >>

• Re: TI-H: Dead?
• From: Giles Pollock <glp71s@mailandnews.com>

• Prev: TI-H: hey (cont.)
• Next: Re: TI-H: hey (cont.)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread