Re: *Please* keep religous stuff Off-List! (was: Re: TI-H: Bill Gates is
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: *Please* keep religous stuff Off-List! (was: Re: TI-H: Bill Gates is the...
but of course...
you see it's kinda like a virus (i.e. Ebola, AIDS, etc...). it's keeps
reproducing and with each generation it it changes a little (each new chain)
sometimes it mutates into something more deadly (in this case where more
people respond) or it just dies out (a "dead end" topic). the problem is
that unlike a human body (or any animal's body) the people of the server
doesn't become imune to this this topic (or in the case of of a body
virus). well thought I'd share my thoughts...
Bernard
oh ya... ...don't respond (that way it'll become a dead virus)
...hehehe cockroaches i like that hehehe...
----- Original Message -----
???: "Grant Stockly" <gussie@stockly.com>
???: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
????: Saturday, January 08, 2000 18:07
??: Re: *Please* keep religous stuff Off-List! (was: Re: TI-H: Bill Gates is
the...
>
> >In a message dated 1/7/2000 10:32:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> >hul@netdoor.com writes:
> >
> ><< As the dude, who started this "infamous thing", I wish to defend
myself (a
> > little late, but too bad). If you don't want your mailboxes flooded,
don't
> > forking reply. >>
> >Hell yes. Every reply generates 10 more replys, and each of those
generates
> >10 more, and they reproduce like cockroaches.
>
> According to you'r theory, 9 people must reply to this. But if they
> replied to MY reply, woudln't that mean they would be starting a new chain
> of replies?
>
>
> :)
>
> Grant
>
References: