TI-H: Re: Re: TI-H OS OT

To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: TI-H: Re: Re: TI-H OS OT
From: "Bernard" <npfs@cybcon.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 17:59:32 -0700
References: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10004281257210.7087-100000@genesis.genetech.net>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


ha i can beat that win95 Version C two months no problems (that was last
year) now i'm surprised if it doesn't crash once every other week/few days.
Bernard

----- Original Message -----
???: "David Knaack" <dknaack@genesis.genetech.net>
???: "TI Hardware" <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
????: Friday, April 28, 2000 11:02
??: TI-H: Re: TI-H OS OT


>
> > My computer has been VERY stable since I installed
> > win98  (er... got rid of Norton)... even more so
> > since win98SE...  I get uptimes of 10-15 days.
>
> Not bad for 98, thats about how long my 98 box at
> work will run, depending on how often I crash the
> programs I'm working on.  As often as I crash
> stuff I'm suprised at how stable it is.  As someone
> else noted, it doesn't even compare to NT5.  I
> installed it many weeks ago, and haven't rebooted
> but twice.
>
> The linux box my web page runs on is linux, and
> as of today has 363 days of up time.  And its been
> running the Seti@home software the whole time :)
>
> DK
>
>

References:

TI-H: Re: TI-H OS OT

From: David Knaack <dknaack@genesis.genetech.net>