Re: TI-H: prob w/ 83+
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: prob w/ 83+
exactly what is a "pure" math class? i agree with all of you these idiots
(at my school, and around my grade) have no need of a calculator of any kind
in what their in (algebra I, which crazy enough is split into two parts) we
don't even need them in Geometry nor Algebra II (which i'm just gonna skip,
stupid class too). that's the problem with the schools here they put way
too much money in sports and not enough in the fine arts (music, which has
many mathmatical properties, liteture, of which programing is based on, and
programming, and yes now it is counted as an art), math, or anything else,
that's why most of the people here are stupid (including the school board
members). you know the highest maht class offered here is only pre
calculas? my goodness, and they don't even have a full trig class either!!!
anyway gotta stop complaining. thanks for the input (even though it didn't
help much).
Bernard
----- Original Message -----
???: "Olle Hedman" <oh@hem.passagen.se>
???: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
????: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 16:56
??: Re: TI-H: prob w/ 83+
>
> tss. In most pure math classes for me in the University, we are not even
allowed
> to use a calc.
> You very seldom really need them. Not in pure math at least.
Implementations is
> a different matter though.
>
> file://Olle
>
> Grant Stockly wrote:
> >
> > >I think the problem is that he has a 83+. Tell him to get a real
calculator
> > >and not what the school tells him to. (Then again. For math up to 11th
grade
> > >you don't need a calculator at all)
> >
> > Some math classes do more than others. I needed a TI-83 in 8th grade.
>
References: