Re: TI-H: Full bus access

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Full bus access
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 21:13:12 -0800
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.990505234254.28450B-100000@sparcy.geneva.edu>
References: <v04020a03b356b6e9b9b3@[24.237.1.119]>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


I've done bus access also.  What I said was they should build a port, not
that we need to do it.

If you look in the archives you will see some articles about bootstraping
your calc from an ethernet network.


>On Wed, 5 May 1999, Grant Stockly wrote:
>
>> I think it would be cool if they made a calc with bus access.  Thats all
>> they really need for neato 3rd party adaptors.
>
>Check my site:
>
>www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/6869
>(case sensitive)
>
>I have been trying for some time to get TICALC to post an article, but to
>no avail.  Frankly, I have no clue why anyone uses the serial port on the
>TI92 for ANYTHING, especially for RAM expanders.  Please though, if anyone
>uses the bus access for anything at all, PLEASE talk to me first.  I have
>a hardware standard for many of my devices that I am going to be releasing
>soon (depending on several things, anywhere from a month to a year) and I
>would like to keep everything that is made using this standard.  I don't
>want this standard posted on my site yet for specific reasons, but I would
>be more than happy to give it to anyone on this list who asks.
>
>Chris Lambert
>EMAIL:  clambert@ieee.org
>
>*** Ever stop to think and forget to start again? ***

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI-H: Full bus access

From: Chris Lambert <clambert@geneva.edu>

References:

Re: TI-H: Re: When will TI release a new calc?

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

TI-H: Full bus access

From: Calan <clambert@geneva.edu>