Re: TI-H: Re: TI Mem

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Re: TI Mem
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:21:23 -0900
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990324194057.007fdc20@gussie.alaska.net>
References: <005301be7648$a81628e0$46adecd0@root>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>Why don't you like to say the fsck word? Oh yea... has anyone developed
>some type of memory package that runs an asm program on the primary memory
>and makes the expanded memory "virtual"?
>That is, a program that would run files on maybe the Expander II like a
>hard disk. This is opposed to the current version where you can only use
>the Expander as a backup and copy files to the primary memory...

The way you'd do something like that is patch an existing shell that
handles vat routines itself.  Then tell the code that there is more than
28k.  The expansion has to be done at a higher level, meaning only special
programs written for a shell would work.

If a shell handles memory routines on its own, when the shell is patched,
programs that earlier would run fine would also run now without problems.

Grant

References:

Re: TI-H: Fw: re:place(who the fuck is this lamer?)

From: "Ryan Pogge" <pogge@shore.intercom.net>

TI-H: Re: TI Mem

From: Dan <danti@applecyber.dyndns.com>

Prev: Re: TI-H: Place (ahhh here is what he meant)
Next: Re: TI-H: grant read this
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread