Re: TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)

Re: TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:22:22 +0200
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• References: <19990624171137.69284.qmail@hotmail.com> <013401bebe6d$91390b20$0a02000a@rdtech.com>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

David Knaack wrote:
> Besides that, the 386 is plenty of power for what they need.  All the
> software and operating systems are custom written, its not like they
> are trying to push around a Microsoft operating slug.

hehe..  when spacestations start running Windows, then it's time to build a bomb
shelter :)
"sorry your spacestation crashed after 46.7 (or what it now was) days, because
of system failure"
lol.

//Olle

• Re: TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)
• From: Rosyna <rosyna@earthlink.net>

• Re: TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)
• From: J D <starkruzr@hotmail.com>
• Re: TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)
• From: "David Knaack" <dknaack@geocities.com>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)
• Next: Re: TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread