Re:TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re:TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)
I imagine there are no commercial PIII emulators for PSX because the PSX's
core processor is a helluva lot closer to a G3 than a Wintel chip.
Which new IBM processors are you referring to?
>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: Re:TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)
>Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:43:07 -0800
>
>
> >Different tests show different results, BYTE showed one thing and
> >MacAddict showed another (G3 40% faster than PIII) but the fact is,
> >what Mac users use their macs for (audio,video,graphic creation) the
> >just whips any pentiums buttocks. The tests you say show the PIII
> >faster are with Word and Word Scrolling times, these tests do not
> >count. Real Mac users are in bed with BBEdit anywho.
>
>I think it is Homo-Gay (Yes, a new word has to be invented for this) how
>fast microsoft makes documents scroll. Macintoshes *CAN* scroll through
>documents faster, but whats the point? When I'm at word at school, I have
>to use the PgUp and Down keys since I can't see whats there!
>
>
>If the PIII is SOOO much faster, why aren't there any commercial PSX
>emulators? :)
>
>I havn't yet seen a PSX game that would be choppy on my sisters 233.
>
>Now, we can get down to buisness with IBMs new chips and do N64...
>
>Grant
>
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
Follow-Ups: