Re:TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re:TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:43:07 -0800
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <v0420540db395c13c4b4c@[206.133.138.43]>
References: <19990622210520.82664.qmail@hotmail.com> <19990622210520.82664.qmail@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>Different tests show different results, BYTE showed one thing and
>MacAddict showed another (G3 40% faster than PIII) but the fact is,
>what Mac users use their macs for (audio,video,graphic creation) the
>just whips any pentiums buttocks. The tests you say show the PIII
>faster are with Word and Word Scrolling times, these tests do not
>count. Real Mac users are in bed with BBEdit anywho.

I think it is Homo-Gay (Yes, a new word has to be invented for this) how
fast microsoft makes documents scroll.  Macintoshes *CAN* scroll through
documents faster, but whats the point?  When I'm at word at school, I have
to use the PgUp and Down keys since I can't see whats there!


If the PIII is SOOO much faster, why aren't there any commercial PSX
emulators?  :)

I havn't yet seen a PSX game that would be choppy on my sisters 233.

Now, we can get down to buisness with IBMs new chips and do N64...

Grant

References:

TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)

From: J D <starkruzr@hotmail.com>

Re:TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)

From: Rosyna <rosyna@earthlink.net>

Prev: Re: TI-H: (OT w/ 486/68000 hybrid)
Next: Re:TI-H: (OT about Grant's 486/68000)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread