Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:04:35 -0800
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990702003251.15163A-100000@evil.ghg.net>
References: <19990701235238.62075.qmail@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>Orginally, the celeron had no l2 cache, but that didn't last long, and any
>celeron above 300 Mhz has 128KB of full speed l2 cache.  It makes up for
>its 4 times smaller cache by being full speed instead of half speed, and
>will hang with a PII of the same clock in almost anything, except maybe
>audocad.  Oh, and they are a lot cheaper.
>http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/weekly_cpu/ has the most recent
>prices.  $53 for a Celeron 300A(with 128K l2 cache), and $35 for a k6-2
>350.  Cheapest PII is $153 for the PII-350.

IBM's chips are nearly $1 per MHz.

References:

Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

From: Cavan Carroll <cavanc@hotmail.com>

Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

From: Sandman <sandmanx@ghg.net>

Prev: Re: TI-H: OT: More evidence :)
Next: Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread