Re: TI-H: radio link...what's stopping us?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: radio link...what's stopping us?
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>>Not necessarily true in either case. If one were to find an
>>integrated transmitter/receiver that would work except
>>required input different than the TI-Protocol (I2C for example),
>>it might be simpler to use it instead of designing a new transmitter/
>>receiver pair, even if that use required software to drive the port.
>
>The point is that you already have an application and a protocol designed,
>you just want to bridge the two. Thats where software comes into play.
Actually no, my point was that it is possably, and in some cases
desirable to build a radio link that does require software to drive
it. I'M NOT SUGGESTING THAT IS THE BEST SOLUTION!
Just that its not "fu**in stupid" to do so.
DK
Follow-Ups: