Re: TI-H: radio link...what's stopping us?

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: radio link...what's stopping us?
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 14:34:17 -0900
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <002701be544e$980ca3a0$c9648ed1@vizzini.rdtech.>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>From: David Norelid <fuzz@pinecrest.edu>
>>what exactly is it that is stopping us from building a working radio link?
>
>Well, I'd say its probably a combination of complexity, skill and
>finally usability.

Money...

>The IR link as a wireless link is good enough for most
>people, although the radio link would certainly have advantages.

I posted plans for an 8 part IR link that works with the ti protocol.

References:

Re: TI-H: radio link...what's stopping us?

From: "David Knaack" <dknaack@geocities.com>

Prev: Re: TI-H: radio link...what's stopping us?
Next: Re: TI-H: radio link...what's stopping us?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread