Re: TI-H: radio link...what's stopping us?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: radio link...what's stopping us?
Kaus wrote:
> >Not necessarily, there would be nothing wrong with building an
> >application specific radio link that required software to drive it,
> >particularly if the software could transmit at a higher data rate
> >than the TI-protocol (which wouldn't be particularly suprising,
> >TI-protocol isn't all that fast). It just wouldn't be as convenient to
> >as many people.
> If that protocol was faster, it would be limited by the fact that you have
> to write the data through the ti protocol to the controller that used the
> transmitter. In fact, unless the controller was just an interpretter, it
> would be slowed down in fact becasue you would have to send it commands and
> such
Exactly! if it is just a throughput that send whatever comes in, it will _both_
work with the ti-protocol _and_ with whatever program you write with higher
datarate (if the link supports that speed that is..)
a simple 2 fq frequensyshift wouldn't that be simplest for this task?
//Olle
References: