Re: TI-H: Re: y2k

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Re: y2k
From: RoniBarrett@aol.com
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 18:22:37 EST
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


In a message dated 12/29/1999 5:07:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
dknaack@rdtech.com writes:

<<  I have
 no idea how dependant nuclear power is on oil >>
Very, nuke plants have just as many (maybe more) moving parts as any other.

As far as im concerned, any company that suffers for y2k problems deserves 
it. They could have corrected for it anytime over the last 5 years, since 
virtually all computers made in that time are y2k compliant, and many of the 
rest are non-date dependant. With a little extra cash, they could have 
corrected for it 10 or 15 years ago. If they arnt ready now, its their own 
damn fault, and they deserve everything the get.

Jeff Barrett

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI-H: Re: y2k

From: "David Knaack" <dknaack@rdtech.com>

Prev: Re: TI-H: EL backlighting [was Re: y2k]
Next: Re: TI-H: Re: y2k
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread