Re: TI-H: I know I'm going to regret this...
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: I know I'm going to regret this...
maybe it is faster and such, when you use the whole package.. I only tried the
shell and then I didn't find any speed improvements. (big suprise..)
It does not seem very good as just a shell replacement. as OS, I havn't tested
it yet.
//Olle
Grant Stockly wrote:
>
> Have you notived that it is written better than MSDOS? Its fast! :)
>
> Its not MSDOS compatible, its a DOS replacement. The programmers didn't
> design it to be a clone of MSDOS, but a substitute for it. its completely
> compatible with DOS programs, but is written in a different way than MSDOS.
>
> Grant
>
> >found one problem with it though... why does it take up so extremly much
> >memory?
> >it grabbes 117K of conventional ram.. 4dos takes 4k.. maybe it workes
> >better
> >with its own kernel...
> >
> >//Olle
> >
> >Olle Hedman wrote:
> >>
> >> Grant Stockly wrote:
> >> > >Isn't it then a problem to run it with win95?
> >> > I've never tried, because I don't care for win95. :)
> >>
> >> > >When I run win95, I dont like the shell command.com provides so I use
> >>4dos
> >> > >instead.
> >> > This is a command.com and OS replacement
> >>
> >> I tried to run the command.com from FreeDOS under w95.. worked perfectly!
> >> I'll try to use it for a while, and see how I like it.
> >> Had one very big plus.. it was the first shell for DOS I've seen that has
> >> "real" tabcompletion..
> >> that is, completes as far as it can, and then if you tab again, shows a
> >>list..
> >> all others has some strange version where you have to tab throug all that
> >> matches.. very bad..
> >> If it has coloring too, I think this is my new shell for dos :)
> >>
> >> //Olle
Follow-Ups:
References: