Re: TI-H: TI Hardware

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: TI Hardware
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 19:09:13 -0800
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <37A199C0.7E16FB16@baladyne.com>
References: <19990730022925.43798.qmail@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>AVR (http://www.avr.com/) is a competing product.  It has several good
>points, but can't yet compete with the PIC on availability and
>peripherals.

Ohh realy.  :)  Thats just not so.

http://www.atmel.com is the manufacture source for information.


>Both are quite spiffy.  You can also look up scenix (http://www.scenix/)
>which is a PIC clone clocking up to 100MHz.  Instead of having
>peripherals built into the chip, they build the peripheral with
>software.  Forinstance, they have a complete 1200 baud modem with DTMF
>dialer program you can run on these chips.  It's way cool.

If you run it in PIC mode, it adds 1/4 to the time, so you get 25MHz and
25MIPS.

I've got AVRs running at 33MHz/MIPS.

In scenix mode, PIC programs need to be ported.

References:

From:

From:

Prev: Re: TI-H: I know I'm going to regret this...
Next: Re: TI-H: I've got two completely unrelated questions
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread