Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic
From: Sandman <sandmanx@ghg.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 10:31:58 -0500 (CDT)
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <370D68F1.64C1681D@alaska.net>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

Under linux there is a player called splay that uses 0.3% of my k6-2 350
processor time according to top.  I was really suprised that it was this
low of usage, and how much processor time is saved by being text based
over GUI based.

On Thu, 8 Apr 1999 amaya@alaska.net wrote:

> 
> While we're on the subject of MP3, what do you think is the MP3 player
> with the lowest overhead?  I've got Winamp right now and it seems like
> all the fancy graphics and stuff slow it down.  Do the sound qualities
> differ between players?  Does anyone care?  (This is after all a TI
> Hardware list, not that anyone would know with the messages we've been
> getting recently.)  Any answers are appreciated.  Turning this message
> into another giant argument with page long quotes is not.  Peace.
>

References:

TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic

From: amaya@alaska.net

Prev: TI-H: Windows Compilers [Was: Linux link software.]
Next: Re: TI-H: Linux link software.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread