Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic

Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic

• To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic
• From: "Ryan Pogge" <pogge@shore.intercom.net>
• Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 22:55:50 -0400
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• References: <e625786.243ec41e@aol.com>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

k-jofol use's less CPU time.

>
> > While we're on the subject of MP3, what do you think is
the MP3 player
> >  with the lowest overhead?  I've got Winamp right now
and it seems like
> >  all the fancy graphics and stuff slow it down.  Do the
sound qualities
> >  differ between players?  Does anyone care?  (This is
after all a TI
> >  Hardware list, not that anyone would know with the
messages we've been
> >  getting recently.)  Any answers are appreciated.
Turning this message
> >  into another giant argument with page long quotes is
not.  Peace.
> turn off visualization, it makes a big difference on slow
computers
> -JJS
>
>

• Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic
• From: SHIVANJJS@aol.com

• Prev: Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic
• Next: Re: TI-H: Linux link software.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread