Re: TI-H: linux...

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: linux...
From: Christopher Kalos <raptorone@geocities.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 01:07:58 -0400
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <l03130315b228709ceb34@[192.168.1.66]> <l03130319b2287c50ab56@[192.168.1.66]>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Yet again, using STANDARIZED TERMS.  I consider them all computers.  That's all.
PC = x86/wintel, Mac=MacOS, and UNIX box = Linux/BSD/SCO/other variants

CK

Grant Stockly wrote:

> >IBM does NOT meant Intel... get it straight... you have an extraordinary
> >fascination with incorrect blanket statements.
>
> Um...  thats what i just said.  The PPC 750 running a realtime OS is much
> better than the PII.  And I don't mean the PPC750 stuck inside a mac, I
> mean a true PPC 750 workstion/server.
>
> >Given the current state of the market, IBM would mean Cyrix.  There is no such
> >thing as a standard IBM, but if you mean PC, then it's a system capable of
> >running the x86 instruction set at a level equivalent to Pentium Classic (2nd
> >generation, >66MHz) or newer.
> >CK
>
> Remember, the mac is a PC.  So is the PPC Amiga...

References:

Re: TI-H: linux...

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

Re: TI-H: linux...

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

Prev: Re: TI-H: linux...
Next: Re: TI-H: Re: Grant: Master of AOL (NOT!)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread