Re: TI-H: e(g) driver

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: e(g) driver
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 15:07:03 -0800
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <013401bdfbb4$00eda020$c16afea9@eddie>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Yes.

It will be a slave.  Not a master.

Grant


>e(g): Expander by Grant
>
>Just answer if it is going to be I2C compatable!!!!  I'd rather have it be
>compatable with I2C than whatever is used for the EII.
>
>-Miles Raymond
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Monday, October 19, 1998 5:43 PM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: e(g) driver
>
>
>>
>>Whats the e(g)?  If I made one it would be exactly compatible as the EII...
>>
>>
>>>hey,
>>>
>>>who is writing the e(g) driver? is e(g) going to be its official name? is
>>>it going to be i2c campatable? answer me dammit!
>>>
>>>
>>>FUZZ
>>>I Don't See Why Not
>>>-------------------
>>>listen.to/yankovic
>>>ICQ: 3512251

References:

Re: TI-H: e(g) driver

From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>