Re: TI-H: TI <--?--> I2C

Re: TI-H: TI <--?--> I2C

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: TI <--?--> I2C
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 17:46:29 -0800
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19981017204142.00798a70@mail.cybrzn.com>
• References: <v04020a03b24ed5798f6d@[192.168.1.66]> <3.0.6.32.19981017111428.007cfba0@mail.cybrzn.com> <003201bdf9e6$59d3f7e0$a0d4fea9@eddie>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>See that now.  Everything should be monospaced tho.  The world is much
>better when it is all monospaced.

I just changed back to Courier.  I upgraded to Eudora Pro and it
automatically decided I'd be better off with Times.  HA!

Z80 ;)

Grant

• Re: TI-H: TI <--?--> I2C
• From: kaus <kaus@cybrzn.com>

• Re: TI-H: TI <--?--> I2C
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: TI <--?--> I2C
• From: kaus <kaus@cybrzn.com>
• Re: TI-H: TI <--?--> I2C
• From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
• Re: TI-H: TI <--?--> I2C
• From: kaus <kaus@cybrzn.com>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: TI <--?--> I2C
• Next: Re: TI-H: TI <--?--> I2C
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread