Re: Re(2): TI-H: Internal Memory Expansion

Re: Re(2): TI-H: Internal Memory Expansion

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Internal Memory Expansion
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1998 22:24:47 -0800
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <73f2e4fd.3616fde2@aol.com>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>In a message dated 10/3/98 11:59:02 PM EDT, gussie@alaska.net writes:
>
>> The internal EII is better than the 28k thing.
>>
>>  >for the internal memory stuff, each mem chip still has to have a copy of
>>  >zshell/usgard in order to run assemblke games on that shell, right? could
>>  >something be made like a port on the side of the calcso you could pulg in
>>  >a mem chip? how many wires would have to be drawn out the of the calc?
>>  >because a cartdridg idea would be really great, even if its only like 28k.
>>  >you could carry around mc miks around in your pocket (even though sqrx is
>>  >better).
>Not if you have an -82 (no driver support.)  If somebody who knows ASM made
>the driver I might actually be able to get an E II.

THe shell has to be fixed before anyone that knows ASm makes a driver.

The 83 has a beta driver, but for the support I get, I might as well not
finish it.

• Re: Re(2): TI-H: Internal Memory Expansion
• From: Firepower5@aol.com

• Prev: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Internal Memory Expansion
• Next: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Internal Memory Expansion
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread