Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)

Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 18:31:38 -0900
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <19981105191038.2583.qmail@hotmail.com>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>>DEFRAG isn't required for transfering 30k per sec.
>
>Why does the transfer rate have anything to do with
>the requirment for defragmentation?

A hd with 500MB separation between each 256 words will still produce 30k a
sec.  There is no bonus of defraging in this case...

Grant

• Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)
• From: "David Knaack" <dknaack@hotmail.com>

• Prev: Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)
• Next: Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread