Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)
From: "Nick S [despuqué]" <worldsnow@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 15:24:05 EST
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Thats what I said... 

>From: "David Knaack" <dknaack@hotmail.com>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)
>Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 11:10:38 PST
>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>
>
>>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>>DEFRAG isn't required for transfering 30k per sec.
>
>Why does the transfer rate have anything to do with
>the requirment for defragmentation?
>
>DK
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Prev: Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications
Next: Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread