Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 20:47:19 -0900
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <363FDCAA.7A41DB97@bellsouth.net>
References: <v04020a04b265696935d6@[192.168.1.66]>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>> Macs aren't better than PCs, and PCs aren't better than Macs.  Each does
>> the same thing the same way (not I/O wise).  If one was better than the
>> other, the bad one would't be sold.  Its that plain.
>>
>
>Take Beta video for instance. Many think it died off, but beta was better than
>vhs.The thing is it didnt die off. It's still used in the tv production of
>today.
>Macs and Pcs will always have a niche to fill.
>                -Michael Malluck
>P.S. All we seem to do on this list is bitch, bitch, bitch. I have one
>word for
>all involved quit-yo-bitchin.:)

Yourself included?  :)

Well, beta costs more...  Macs and PCs cost the same, so they both coexist...

References:

Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications

From: John Malluck <malluck@bellsouth.net>

Prev: Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications
Next: TI-H: Radio Link (attn Grant Stockly)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread