Re: TI-H: TI-MemSwitch
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: TI-MemSwitch
>>From owner-ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se Thu
>May 21 17:56:15 1998
>>Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
>>Received: by towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se (VMailer, from userid
>507)
>> id 441A16C1F9; Fri, 22 May 1998 02:55:42 +0200 (CEST)
>>Message-Id: <v0211014cb18a6e5a0213@[192.168.1.250]>
>>Mime-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 16:51:29 -0700
>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>From: gussie@alaska.net (Grant Stockly)
>>Subject: Re: TI-H: TI-MemSwitch
>>Sender: owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>Precedence: list
>>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>Errors-To: ti-hardware-errors@lists.ticalc.org
>>
>>
>>>>From owner-ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se Thu
>>>May 21 16:55:30 1998
>>>>Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
>>>>Received: by towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se (VMailer, from userid
>>>507)
>>>> id 4418F4D390; Fri, 22 May 1998 01:55:02 +0200 (CEST)
>>>>Message-Id: <v02110128b18a602fadc8@[192.168.1.250]>
>>>>Mime-Version: 1.0
>>>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>>Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 15:50:49 -0700
>>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>>>From: gussie@alaska.net (Grant Stockly)
>>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: TI-MemSwitch
>>>>Sender: owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>>>Precedence: list
>>>>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>>>Errors-To: ti-hardware-errors@lists.ticalc.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>the memory upgrade which adds 128k of true RAM memory is very
>>>difficult
>>>>>and there would be no way to make it external(well you could but it
>>>>>would be messy) you would have to add a 50 pin centronics port to
>the
>>>>>calc! and have a 50 wire cable between the box and the calc!
>>>>
>>>>You don't need 50 wires for a memory chip... :)
>>>
>>>yea but 25 wont do it either.... I was just makeing a point that
>putting
>>>it outside the calc would be stupid...
>>
>>36 would I think...
>
>its a 32 pin dip i think
Or is it SOIC...? I don't think they'd use dip on a surface mount board...