RE: TI-H: TI-89

To: "'ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org'" <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: TI-H: TI-89
From: "Williams, Matt" <Williams.Matt@con-way.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 15:41:03 -0800
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


The 92 plus module IS flash upgradable, but I agree with you about the
screen size making them incompatible.

>----------
>From: 	Richard Piotter[SMTP:richfile@prairie.lakes.com]
>Reply To: 	ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Sent: 	Monday, March 16, 1998 9:37 AM
>To: 	ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: 	Re: TI-H: TI-89
>
>
>No, the calcs may be fairly compatible, but the LCD resolution is
>different, and geometry is not included. Just the LCD is a prime
>indicator the ROMs are incompatible. If you tride switching them, (which
>also is very unlikely) the LCDs ould NOT work. Also, if the ROM is flash
>upgradable, that means the chips aren't even the same KIND of memory!
>
>> >I wonder if it will have an exact replica of a plus module in it...  If
>> >so, those of us with a 92 could possibly just get an 89, and transfer the
>> >plus module from calc to calc if necessary...  Just a thought...
>
>-- 
>
>
>Richard Piotter
>richfile@prairie.lakes.com
>
>The Richfiles TI Hardware and BASIC web page:
>http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lakes/5081/Richfiles.html
>

Prev: Re: TI-H: TI-89
Next: Re: TI-H: 92+ or HP 48GX
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread