Re: TI-H: New Cases
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: New Cases
Im not saying not to include it, but that no potential applications would
ever be devolped because it would be so complex. It makes no sense to use
something complex when the linkport goes just as fast and is easier to
use...
>Sure, I was just coming up with ideas. . .
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Tuesday, March 03, 1998 4:27 PM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: New Cases
>
>
>>
>>It still will never catch on. If you plan to market your case, you need to
>>stay with the link port. If you had DBA and all this other stuff it would
>>make installing it harder, and it would mean the user had to be super
>>careful with the stuff.
>>
>>One point is that the link port can go a whole lot faster than 2k. The
>>things that hold back the speed are the OS, memory, and the way the
>>processor handles interrupts/I/O... DBA wouldn't be much faster than the
>>link port. Remebmber that Mel is working on reliable 20kbps transfers so
>>you should just stay with the link port...
>>
>>>Not for long, I'm trying to figure out how to use it.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>Date: Monday, March 02, 1998 7:39 PM
>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: New Cases
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>DBA port - maybe
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>DBA is useless.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>