Re: TI-H: EVERYBODY SHUT UP!!!!!!!!
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: EVERYBODY SHUT UP!!!!!!!!
Since I belong to many lists, here is what I did. In Microsoft Outlook
Express (comes with 4.0) I created folders for each list. Then, I told it
to sort by subject. It's great! I can archive each list, without worrying
about important e-mails.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Doty <jdaomteys@juno.com>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Tuesday, March 03, 1998 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: TI-H: EVERYBODY SHUT UP!!!!!!!!
>
>Isn't there a digest version of this list? I'm pretty sure that you can
>send a message to:
>majordomo@lists.ticalc.org
>and in the body say:
>subscribe ti-hardware-digest
>
>This is true for many other mailing lists on ticalc, so probably for this
>one, too.
>BTW: incase you were wondering, a digest version is you getting one or
>two messages from the list a day, with all of the messages in those few.
>
>also, you could take out a seperate e-mail account just for the list.
>Yahoo, AltaVista, HotMail, and Juno are the free services that offer free
>mail that I can think of off hand. Or, check w/ your ISP and see if they
>can get you a second address.
>
>--JdAoMtEyS
>-----------------------------
>"Oh my god, they killed Kenny!"
>
>On Tue, 3 Mar 1998 21:49:14 +0100 (MET) gormbr@online.no (Probe Doggie)
>writes:
>>
>>For God´s sake! I just had an insane 220 messages in the last 1 1/2
>>days!!!
>>And all the messages are from the same 15 (give or take people).
>>
>>Look I know it´s inconvenient but just mosh all your mail together in
>>one
>>neat bundle. That way maybe people will bother to read what you´re
>>saying
>>instead of just mass deleting the twelve or so messages you send
>>because
>>they´re all one-sentence replies followed by about a kilobyte of
>>>>>>>>>>>´s. KNOCK IT OFF!!
>>
>>Try to stick to one message a day. In this fashion, The number of
>>messages
>>will be reduced to about 7%.
>>
>>Probe Doggie.
>>
>>P.S.
>>
>>From: nuke@bayside.net
>>X-Authentication-Warning: nuklear.steelcity.net: nuke owned process
>>doing -bs
>>Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:20:19 -0500 (EST)
>>X-Sender: nuke@nuklear.steelcity.net
>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by
>>towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se id VAA08373
>>Sender: owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>Precedence: list
>>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>
>>
>>On Sun, 1 Mar 1998, Grant Stockly wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Actually there is no superior OS, and Macs and IBMs are both PCs...
>>>
>>> If there was a superior OS it wouldn't run on Intel, it would run on
>>IBM
>>> Inc. processors.
>>
>>if it were truly superior, it would run on anything
>>
>>--- well Rhapsody is going to be cross-platform (intel and IBM)
>>
>>
>>
>>>If you were to build a link cable into your ti, how long would you
>>want
>>>it? I have a 21' cable, and it's the size of a donut. (MMM donuts).
>>>But what size would be good for most of you?
>>>Also, does the IR/RF/Remote control "links" each need a seperate
>>>transmitting "eye" (by eye I mean the 'window' on a remote control.
>>>
>>>~Larry C
>>>Larry1492@juno.com
>>
>>Not too long, because the signals get kinda weak after about 50 cms
>>(unless
>>you shove a signal amplifier in there which is...not really required).
>>Mine
>>is bout a foot long (my serial cable). Overall, a short cable is a
>>better
>>bet.
>>
>>__________________________________________________________________________
______
>>My contribution to wasting bandwidth.
>>
>>
>>
>
>_____________________________________________________________________
>You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
>Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
>Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
>