Re: TI-H: EVERYBODY SHUT UP!!!!!!!!


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: EVERYBODY SHUT UP!!!!!!!!




If you want to lessen the number of messages you get, unsubscribe...  i
don't recommend sending a message like the one you sent...  Now you will
have 100+ messages, plus twenty unimportant messages like this one that I
am sending, telling you that you can't control the list :)

- noah zoschke (nzoschke@juno.com)

On Tue, 3 Mar 1998 21:49:14 +0100 (MET) gormbr@online.no (Probe Doggie)
writes:
>
>For God´s sake! I just had an insane 220 messages in the last 1 1/2 
>days!!!
>And all the messages are from the same 15 (give or take people).
>
>Look I know it´s inconvenient but just mosh all your mail together in 
>one
>neat bundle. That way maybe people will bother to read what you´re 
>saying
>instead of just mass deleting the twelve or so messages you send 
>because
>they´re all one-sentence replies followed by about a kilobyte of
>>>>>>>>>>´s. KNOCK IT OFF!!
>
>Try to stick to one message a day. In this fashion, The number of 
>messages
>will be reduced to about 7%.
>
>Probe Doggie.
>
>P.S.
>
>From: nuke@bayside.net
>X-Authentication-Warning: nuklear.steelcity.net: nuke owned process 
>doing -bs
>Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:20:19 -0500 (EST)
>X-Sender: nuke@nuklear.steelcity.net
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by
>towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se id VAA08373
>Sender: owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>
>
>On Sun, 1 Mar 1998, Grant Stockly wrote:
>
>>
>> Actually there is no superior OS, and Macs and IBMs are both PCs...
>>
>> If there was a superior OS it wouldn't run on Intel, it would run on 
>IBM
>> Inc. processors.
>
>if it were truly superior, it would run on anything
>
>--- well Rhapsody is going to be cross-platform (intel and IBM)
>
>
>
>>If you were to build a link cable into your ti, how long would you 
>want
>>it?  I have a 21' cable, and it's the size of a donut.  (MMM donuts).
>>But what size would be good for most of you?
>>Also, does the IR/RF/Remote control "links" each need a seperate
>>transmitting "eye" (by eye I mean the 'window' on a remote control.
>>
>>~Larry C
>>Larry1492@juno.com
>
>Not too long, because the signals get kinda weak after about 50 cms 
>(unless
>you shove a signal amplifier in there which is...not really required). 
>Mine
>is bout a foot long (my serial cable). Overall, a short cable is a 
>better
>bet.
>
>________________________________________________________________________________
>My contribution to wasting bandwidth.
>
>
>

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]


References: