Re: TI-H: EVERYBODY SHUT UP!!!!!!!!
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: EVERYBODY SHUT UP!!!!!!!!
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Probe Doggie wrote:
>
> For God´s sake! I just had an insane 220 messages in the last 1 1/2 days!!!
> And all the messages are from the same 15 (give or take people).
i had around 520 just yesterday.. and there are still mailing lists i'd
like to be on. give it a rest.
>
> Look I know it´s inconvenient but just mosh all your mail together in one
> neat bundle. That way maybe people will bother to read what you´re saying
> instead of just mass deleting the twelve or so messages you send because
> they´re all one-sentence replies followed by about a kilobyte of
> >>>>>>>>>´s. KNOCK IT OFF!!
>
> Try to stick to one message a day. In this fashion, The number of messages
> will be reduced to about 7%.
>
> Probe Doggie.
>
> P.S.
>
> From: nuke@bayside.net
> X-Authentication-Warning: nuklear.steelcity.net: nuke owned process doing -bs
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:20:19 -0500 (EST)
> X-Sender: nuke@nuklear.steelcity.net
> To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by
> towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se id VAA08373
> Sender: owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
> Precedence: list
> Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>
>
> On Sun, 1 Mar 1998, Grant Stockly wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually there is no superior OS, and Macs and IBMs are both PCs...
> >
> > If there was a superior OS it wouldn't run on Intel, it would run on IBM
> > Inc. processors.
>
> if it were truly superior, it would run on anything
>
> --- well Rhapsody is going to be cross-platform (intel and IBM)
>
>
>
> >If you were to build a link cable into your ti, how long would you want
> >it? I have a 21' cable, and it's the size of a donut. (MMM donuts).
> >But what size would be good for most of you?
> >Also, does the IR/RF/Remote control "links" each need a seperate
> >transmitting "eye" (by eye I mean the 'window' on a remote control.
> >
> >~Larry C
> >Larry1492@juno.com
>
> Not too long, because the signals get kinda weak after about 50 cms (unless
> you shove a signal amplifier in there which is...not really required). Mine
> is bout a foot long (my serial cable). Overall, a short cable is a better
> bet.
>
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> My contribution to wasting bandwidth.
>
>
_ _ __ __ _ _ _
| / |/ /_ __/ /_____ | Nuke Skyjumper |
| / / // / '_/ -_) | "Master of the Farce" |
|_ /_/|_/\_,_/_/\_\\__/ _|_ nuke@bayside.net _|
References: