Re: TI-H: random email
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: random email
mine .7
>Cool! a calculator more powerful than most computers! Did you know that my
>1st computer was 4.4mhz :-)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 7:09 PM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>
>
>>
>>Lets make a calc with one then? :D
>>
>>With a perimitive TI82 rom it should be, say 90,000 times faster than a
>TI92!
>>
>>>DEC already did it - new Alpha
>>>
>>>-- Jon Olson
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Robert Brack <reb@netride.com>
>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 11:00 PM
>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Yeah, did you hear they are coming out with a 1-teraflop (1000mhz) chip in
>a
>>>few years?
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 4:25 PM
>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Actually there is no superior OS, and Macs and IBMs are both PCs...
>>>
>>>If there was a superior OS it wouldn't run on Intel, it would run on IBM
>>>Inc. processors.
>>>
>>>>That's ok, we KNOW the superior OS, PC of course!
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Robert Cicconetti <zarquon@mdo.net>
>>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 9:50 AM
>>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Please, take it to e-mail; the last thing this list needs is another
>>>PC/MAC
>>>>flame war.. Too bad about the Newtons, though..
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: MangoMan43 <MangoMan43@aol.com>
>>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 12:03 PM
>>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>In a message dated 98-03-01 09:15:50 EST, you write:
>>>>>
>>>>><<
>>>>> It4s the reason you aren4t lumbered with stone-age command-line
>>>interfaces
>>>>> as your only OS option, buddy.
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. The 750 chip is 12.8% faster than an equivalent Pentium II chip,
>and
>>>>> stuff your alpha arguments right back up where they came from. >>
>>>>>
>>>>>I think its kinda funny that on the newest breed of Mac's, Windows will
>>>run
>>>>>better on that machine, then on a PC.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just my .02
>>>>>Dave
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>