Re: TI-H: random email

To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
From: "Robert Brack" <reb@netride.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 00:02:07 -0500
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

Cool!  a calculator more powerful than most computers!  Did you know that my
1st computer was 4.4mhz :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: TI-H: random email


>
>Lets make a calc with one then?   :D
>
>With a perimitive TI82 rom it should be, say 90,000 times faster than a
TI92!
>
>>DEC already did it - new Alpha
>>
>>-- Jon Olson
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Robert Brack <reb@netride.com>
>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 11:00 PM
>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>
>>
>>
>>Yeah, did you hear they are coming out with a 1-teraflop (1000mhz) chip in
a
>>few years?
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 4:25 PM
>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>
>>
>>
>>Actually there is no superior OS, and Macs and IBMs are both PCs...
>>
>>If there was a superior OS it wouldn't run on Intel, it would run on IBM
>>Inc. processors.
>>
>>>That's ok, we KNOW the superior OS, PC of course!
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Robert Cicconetti <zarquon@mdo.net>
>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 9:50 AM
>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Please, take it to e-mail;  the last thing this list needs is another
>>PC/MAC
>>>flame war.. Too bad about the Newtons, though..
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: MangoMan43 <MangoMan43@aol.com>
>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 12:03 PM
>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>In a message dated 98-03-01 09:15:50 EST, you write:
>>>>
>>>><<
>>>> It4s the reason you aren4t lumbered with stone-age command-line
>>interfaces
>>>> as your only OS option, buddy.
>>>>
>>>> P.S. The 750 chip is 12.8% faster than an equivalent Pentium II chip,
and
>>>> stuff your alpha arguments right back up where they came from. >>
>>>>
>>>>I think its kinda funny that on the newest breed of Mac's, Windows will
>>run
>>>>better on that machine, then on a PC.
>>>>
>>>>Just my .02
>>>>Dave
>>>>
>
>
>