Re: TI-H: random email
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: random email
Lets make a calc with one then? :D
With a perimitive TI82 rom it should be, say 90,000 times faster than a TI92!
>DEC already did it - new Alpha
>
>-- Jon Olson
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Brack <reb@netride.com>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 11:00 PM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>
>
>
>Yeah, did you hear they are coming out with a 1-teraflop (1000mhz) chip in a
>few years?
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 4:25 PM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>
>
>
>Actually there is no superior OS, and Macs and IBMs are both PCs...
>
>If there was a superior OS it wouldn't run on Intel, it would run on IBM
>Inc. processors.
>
>>That's ok, we KNOW the superior OS, PC of course!
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Robert Cicconetti <zarquon@mdo.net>
>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 9:50 AM
>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>
>>
>>
>>Please, take it to e-mail; the last thing this list needs is another
>PC/MAC
>>flame war.. Too bad about the Newtons, though..
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: MangoMan43 <MangoMan43@aol.com>
>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 12:03 PM
>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>
>>
>>>
>>>In a message dated 98-03-01 09:15:50 EST, you write:
>>>
>>><<
>>> It4s the reason you aren4t lumbered with stone-age command-line
>interfaces
>>> as your only OS option, buddy.
>>>
>>> P.S. The 750 chip is 12.8% faster than an equivalent Pentium II chip, and
>>> stuff your alpha arguments right back up where they came from. >>
>>>
>>>I think its kinda funny that on the newest breed of Mac's, Windows will
>run
>>>better on that machine, then on a PC.
>>>
>>>Just my .02
>>>Dave
>>>