Re: TI-H: robotics (was TI-H: RE: cool)

Re: TI-H: robotics (was TI-H: RE: cool)

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: robotics (was TI-H: RE: cool)
• From: matt.johnson@wmich.edu
• Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 19:00:56 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-reply-to: <2b81d8fd.358fdcae@aol.com>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

Because that is what you said. most people trust what others say to be the
thruth. 

-Matt     <matt.johnson@wmich.edu>


On Tue, 23 Jun 1998 KrazyJolt@aol.com wrote:

> 
> In a message dated 6/22/98 11:16:58 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> matt.johnson@wmich.edu writes:
> 
> > 
> >  The point of the picture was to make you realise just how thick a two inch
> >  cable is. It does not even need to be close to actual size to acomplish
> >  this task, as you have already demonstrated.
> >  
> 
> why was the 2" cable thing taken literally?!?!
> 

• Re: TI-H: robotics (was TI-H: RE: cool)
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

• Re: TI-H: robotics (was TI-H: RE: cool)
• From: KrazyJolt@aol.com

• Prev: Re: TI-H: robotics (was TI-H: RE: cool)
• Next: TI-H: My calc
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread