Re: Re(2): TI-H: Fun-tography Ability????? (fwd)

Re: Re(2): TI-H: Fun-tography Ability????? (fwd)

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Fun-tography Ability????? (fwd)
• From: morph- <morph@jmss.com>
• Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 14:27:59 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <v02110122b19c8795b0ae@[192.168.1.250]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

Well...i leave on saturday. so please hurry if you would. I need something
to occupy my time all week. I'm planning on having a fully functioning
driver by the time i get back (which...given a week of summer vacation,
shouldn't be a problem)...

-- Jon Olson


On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Grant Stockly wrote:

> 
> >Alright...i've got nothing to do next week while i'm going on vacation
> >(me? outdoors? hell not) so if ya give me the protocol spec, i can write a
> >driver. won't be able to update you about status for a week though,
> >obviously. i'll code it for usgard for the simple reason i don't like any
> >other shells. port it if you like. all i need now is the spec from grant.?
> >:>
> 
> I'll give it to you after I make it...
> 

• Re: Re(2): TI-H: Fun-tography Ability????? (fwd)
• From: gussie@alaska.net (Grant Stockly)

• Prev: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Fun-tography Ability????? (fwd)
• Next: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Fun-tography Ability????? (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread