Re: TI-H: MP3s (fwd)

To: TI-Hardware <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: TI-H: MP3s (fwd)
From: morph- <morph@jmss.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 14:10:34 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org




---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 13:10:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: morph- <morph@notebook.jmss.com>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: MP3s

Actually...a 133 plays mp3s just fine
so does a 120
hell...a 75 will play them fine
if yer system IS to slow however, it skips a lot, kind of like a severely
scratched cd

On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, David Knaack wrote:

> 
> From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
> >I made an MP3 player...  I know this kind of stuff...  :)  I'm not
> crazy!
> >The calc controlls the MP3 player which is NOT on the calc...  If it
> takes
> >a 166MHz pent or a 80MHz mac to play mp3s, I'd like to see the
> codeing for
> >a 7MHz z80...  :)
> 
> 
> What happens if you run it on a slower processor (say a intelP133MMX)?
> Thats what I did my testing on.
> 
> Is there a major degradation in sound quality?
> 
> DK
>

Prev: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Fun-tography Ability????? (fwd)
Next: Re: TI-H: MP3s
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread