Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.

Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 22:07:52 -0800 (AKDT)
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <35B1887F.61DD641F@flash.net>
• References: <l03130317b1d5554cda8b@[192.168.1.66]> <l0313030cb1d52e89be4f@[192.168.1.66]> <l0313030cb1d52e89be4f@[192.168.1.66]> <l03130317b1d5554cda8b@[192.168.1.66]> <l0313031eb1d566e6fdc2@[192.168.1.66]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>Grant Stockly wrote:
>
>> Well, it figures...  Atmel can't say anything in true in their docs untill
>> people get mad with complaints.  mel, maybe they are right.  Have you tried
>> 10,000 times?  :)
>
>I got about 75,000 consecutive, sequential read/writes out of an AT45
>chip
>without a single error, and could probably get twice as many if I took
>the time to test it some more. Still, there is no way it will make 1M.

More and more, atmel should wait and release good specs...

• Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• From: Bryan Rittmeyer <bryanr@flash.net>

• Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• From: bryanr <bryanr@flash.net>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: why is the AVR better
• Next: Re: TI-H: Ministik UUE Part 1 of 7
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread