Re: TI-H: Back to basics
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Back to basics
>realize, Grant represents the leading force of vaporware on this list.
>No one has seen a picture of his mp3 player, the CalcNet, to the best of
>my knowledge and that of others, died shortly after all non MBus related
After I finished the hardware to figure out you didn't want to make a driver.
>networking concepts became his, and his expanders, however they might
>work, are also unseen by most. In addition, random quips in response to
>longer messages (which increase the time it takes for me to d/l my
>mail), and unsubstantiated/incorrect claims have gone up, as can be seen
They are not incorrect, they were just written by me wrong, and Mel alaways
gives me a hard time for some reason. Ever since I told him I was making
an IDE chip with the AVR he thinks I know nothing because it is slow and he
thinks that I said it would do Ultra DMA or something. It does get half of
PIO O though. (Bottob of the line divided by two. :) )
>by Mel's recent corrections, and Bryan's, and a few others. I'd dig up
>the evidence, but I delete most TI-H mail after reading it in order to
>spare my precious hard drive space. The point I'm trying to make, and
>as kindly as possible, is that you talk the talk, but no one has ever
>seen you walk the walk outside of Alaska. You have webspace, and you
Come to alaska then.
>obviously have access to either a digital camera or a scanner, so why
>can't you just post pictures of your projects? If I'm going to see an
I just got a new computer on 6/12/98, and I only have a Microtek III
scanner for 3 days (I'm borrowing it). before I got the new computer, I
never had a digitalizer. I'll post a picture of the EIII.
>image on your site, I don't want it to be what gussie.alaska.net looks
I didn't say you did, But alot of other people wanted to. I'm sorry. I'll
have to meet your needs by provideing you a 2400dpi scanned image in a
million of colors, of my entire TI junk pile.
>like. When I want to see a hodgepodge of old machines and cannibalized
>systems all souped up to try to keep up with the times, I'll look in my
Yeah. You saw it yesterday. You saw a picture of a 25MHz mac with no FPU
and 4MB of ram serving the ACPlay www page. You also saw a picture of a
33MHz 486SX running linux as my ftp server. You saw a 5 year old netowrk
printserver/modem server/remote access server/ect. You saw 2 100MB IBM
SCSI I drives, and in the picture you saw the old Asante' Print Server.
>room. Let's SEE the ACPlay, let's SEE the EMCXXVII or whatever version
>you claimed to get to, and let's SEE the CalcNet wired and working. And
>if you stop working on something, let it be known. There are plenty of
>others out there willing to take over.
Okay. Name a project and I'll find the source in my IBM. I was just
jokeing about all those Es. The furthest I got is the EIII which I will
post a picture of.
I will give you a picture of the EIII. it is the version with 1MB of flash
and IDE hard drive. I sold Jon Olsen (or will once he gets back) 2 of the
chips programmed for IDE. I can't show a picture of the CalcNet because
the second you and the other 4 people said you didn't have time to write
the drivers, I ripped it off the bread board and started on the IDE thing.
Ohh...btw. Please flame me off the list. They do not need to hear
unsupported complaints. I have source code to almost every TI project I've
made. (Unless it was durring christmas, then its on my NEC)
Follow-Ups:
References: