Re: TI-H: Power PC
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Power PC
UDMA is about as fast(or faster) then SCSI
joe
Adam Johnson wrote:
> Oh, NO! A Mac PC war. Here's my 2 cents....
>
> Each bring it a specific 'better' portion to the table. Macs have built-in
> SCSI and it has allways been that way. They realised that SCSI was better,
> faster, but harder to use, and decided speed benefits outweighed the diffaculty.
> IBM's on the other hand, wanted simplistic hardware so anyone, pretty much,
> could get inside their computer and fiddle with it. That is why DOS was so hard
> to use. You can't have hardware and software simple at the same time, the
> computer will melt down, and the software will crash a lot. (Hence, Win95/98
> making its interface more simple, causes it to crash a lot. ; ) ) Anyway, the
> main idea is:
>
> Mac: Easy to use SOFTWARE, pain in the butt HARDWARE.
> IBM: Pain in the ass SOFTWARE, easy (For MOST people) to change HARDWARE.
>
> (NOTE: Sometimes, the hardware wasn't very easy, this was because people are
> stupid. It really is simple, they used Mac software, and thought, 'Hey! If our
> hardware was like THIS, we could take over the world!' Obivously they were
> wrong. What really happens is, it creates a confilict, which the average NEW
> user is too stupid to fix, so they call an advanced users. Pay them lots of
> money, and they fix it, while telling the other person what they just did.
> (which the other person has no clue what they said.) )
>
> Adam
Follow-Ups:
References: