Re: TI-H: Power PC

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: Power PC


Internally, so do the Pentium Pro/][ and up...  but the problem is that they
have to use a CISC architecture externally to remain compatible... It's a pain,
but it works... with each new CPU, we move further away from CISC, but at the
same time, Intel keeps adding more crap, like MMX and now KNI, the new
multimedia extensions... argh...  They don't know if they're coming or going.
    And by the way, when I mentioned Linux for the Mac/PowerMAc/whatever the
hell you want to call it, I meant Linux, not some Apple hack job.  Linux has
been proven , blah blah blah, and already runs, so why reinvent the wheel, when
we've seen that Apple can't commit to a decent marketing model?  I'm sorry, but
when most people think "Power Computing," or for that matter, computing at all,
the Mac just doesn't show up.  You can get all the vendors you want, but it's
just about too late to bother trying.  Sadly, the Wintel alliance managed to get
better PR people, even if they do create their CG commercials on Macs...

CK

Joseph M. Geiss wrote:

> the AMD K6 line(and the K6-2's) of PC processors has a RISC architecture
>
> joe
>
> Grant Stockly wrote:
>
> > >>I'm sorry to say but Apple is just going to kill themselves with this
> > >>Power PC.  With Macs holding about 3% of the computer market you can't
> > >>even buy software for them any more.  That's why they made the Power PC,
> > >>but why buy a Mac to run PC software when it cost more and isn't as
> > >>good? Apple is dead, there just looking for a place lo lie down.
> > >>
> > >>> My friend had a PowerMac G3 and it can encode one very fast!  Power to
> > >>> the Power PC!
> > >
> > >What are you talking about?  They're making new software all of the time.
> > > The Power PC wasn't made specifically to run PC software.  Hello!
> >
> > Just by hearing the name PowerPC, you know its better than any Intel or
> > compatible.  The PPC uses RISC technology (~4 years old) and the intel
> > processors use CISC technology (~22 years old).  For one thing, the C
> > stands for complicated and the R stands for reduced.  If you want, I can
> > show you a programming example for each in machine code and you can see
> > which can do the same process faster.
Follow-Ups: References: